While the world is being detracted by the most likely geo-engineered Philippine HyperTyphoon Haiyan, which killed at least 10,000 and made survivors ‘walking around like zombies’ in the former U.S.colony and today’s USAmerican dependent (and conveniently the disaster-storm then went to North-East Vietnam), the current operations at the (geo-engineered?) tsunami-damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan have developed into an extremely dangerous stage, which requires world-attention and security measures.
Or shall all these other events also avert global attention just from the fact that the Iran Nuclear Programme Deal failed due to a French Block:with a new Saudi-French Alliance emerging or put the blinkers on for Nov. 13 and its first signs?
ECOTERRA Intl. already warned many times – most intensively on 09. Sept. 2013 and most recently on 05. Nov. 2013, about the Fukushima dangers, while since a year even scientists are arrested in Japan to shut critical voices out, and Imperial Princess Takamado of Japan and her team walked away with their money for having secured the in-transparent and likely corrupted 2020 Olympic games bid.
We’re In The Most Dangerous Moment Since the Cuban Missile Crisis
Submitted by George Washington on 08/Nov./2013
Scientists Warn of Extreme Risk
We’ve long said that the greatest short-term threat to humanity is from the fuel pools at Fukushima.
The Japanese nuclear agency recently green-lighted the removal of the spent fuel rods from Fukushima reactor 4′s spent fuel pool. The operation has begun.
The head of the U.S. Department of Energy correctly notes:
The success of the cleanup also has global significance. So we all have a direct interest in seeing that the next steps are taken well, efficiently and safely.
If one of the pools collapsed or caught fire, it could have severe adverse impacts not only on Japan … but the rest of the world, including the United States. Indeed, a Senator called it a national security concern for the U.S.:
The radiation caused by the failure of the spent fuel pools in the event of another earthquake could reach the West Coast within days. That absolutely makes the safe containment and protection of this spent fuel a security issue for the United States.
Hiroaki Koide – a nuclear scientist working at the University of Kyoto – says:
I’m worried about whether Tepco can treat all the 1,331 [spent-fuel] assemblies without any problem and how long it will take.
Award-winning scientist David Suzuki says that Fukushima is terrifying, Tepco and the Japanese government are lying through their teeth, and Fukushima is “the most terrifying situation I can imagine”.
Suzuki notes that reactor 4 is so badly damaged that – if there’s another earthquake of 7 or above – the building could come down. And the probability of another earthquake of 7 or above in the next 3 years is over 95%.
Suzuki says that he’s seen a paper that says that if – in fact – the 4th reactor comes down, “it’s bye bye Japan, and everyone on the West Coast of North America should evacuate. Now if that’s not terrifying, I don’t know what is.
WATCH the Suzuki/Schindler VIDEO: Dire Warning – You decide: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTqzqoKMLEg&feature=player_embedded
The Telegraph reported:
The operator of Japan’s crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant … will begin a dry run of the procedure at the No. 4 reactor, which experts have warned carries grave risks.
“Did you ever play pick up sticks?” asked a foreign nuclear expert who has been monitoring Tepco’s efforts to regain control of the plant. “You had 50 sticks, you heaved them into the air and than had to take one off the pile at a time.
“If the pile collapsed when you were picking up a stick, you lost,” he said. “There are 1,534 pick-up sticks in a jumble in top of an unsteady reactor 4. What do you think can happen?
“I do not know anyone who is confident that this can be done since it has never been tried.”
One slip-up in the latest step to decommission Japan’s crippled Fukushima nuclear plant could trigger a “monumental” chain reaction, experts warn.
Experts around the world have warned … that the fuel pool is in a precarious state – vulnerable to collapsing in another big earthquake.
Yale University professor Charles Perrow wrote about the number 4 fuel pool this year in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
“This has me very scared,” he told the ABC.
“Tokyo would have to be evacuated because [the] caesium and other poisons that are there will spread very rapidly.
Perrow also argues:
Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas including Tokyo. Because of the radiation at the site the 6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years.
Former Japanese ambassador Akio Matsumura warns that – if the operation isn’t done right – this could one day be considered the start of “the ultimate catastrophe of the world and planet”:
Save this Video before it is deleated: http://www.voanews.com/media/video/1770268.html
(He also argues that removing the fuel rods will take “decades rather than months.)
Move south of the equator if that ever happened, I think that’s probably the lesson there.
Harvey Wasserman wrote two months ago:
We are now within two months of what may be humankind’s most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Should the attempt fail, the rods could be exposed to air and catch fire, releasing horrific quantities of radiation into the atmosphere. The pool could come crashing to the ground, dumping the rods together into a pile that could fission and possibly explode. The resulting radioactive cloud would threaten the health and safety of all us.
A new fuel fire at Unit 4 would pour out a continuous stream of lethal radioactive poisons for centuries.
Former Ambassador Mitsuhei Murata says full-scale releases from Fukushima “would destroy the world environment and our civilization. This is not rocket science, nor does it connect to the pugilistic debate over nuclear power plants. This is an issue of human survival.”
Even Japan’s Top Nuclear Regulator Says that The Operation Carries a “Very Large Risk Potential”
Even the head of Japan’s nuclear agency is worried. USA Today notes:
Nuclear regulatory chairman Shunichi Tanaka, however, warned that removing the fuel rods from Unit 4 would be difficult because of the risk posed by debris that fell into the pool during the explosions.
“It’s a totally different operation than removing normal fuel rods from a spent fuel pool,” Tanaka said at a regular news conference. “They need to be handled extremely carefully and closely monitored. You should never rush or force them out, or they may break.”
He said it would be a disaster if fuel rods are pulled forcibly and are damaged or break open when dropped from the pool, located about 30 meters (100 feet) above ground, releasing highly radioactive material. “I’m much more worried about this than contaminated water,” Tanaka said
The same top Japanese nuclear official said:
The process involves a very large risk potential.
The BBC reported:
A task of extraordinary delicacy and danger is about to begin at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power station.
One senior official told me: “It’s going to be very difficult but it has to happen.”
Why It’s Such a Difficult Operation
CNN notes that debris in the fuel pool might interfere with operations:
- Journey to the heart of Fukushima’s crippled nuclear plant updated November 7, 2013
- After talking about spent nuclear fuel rods at Fukushima for more than two years, it is slightly disconcerting to suddenly be a few meters from them.
- CNN’s Paula Hancocks tours the damaged Fukushima power plant..
- The children of Fukushima updated November 7, 2013
- Fukushima children pay the price of nuclear energy gone wrong. CNN’s Kyung Lah reports.
South China Morning Post noted:
Nothing remotely similar has been attempted before and … it is feared that any error of judgment could lead to a massive release of radiation into the atmosphere.
A spokesman for Tepco … admitted, however, that it was not clear whether any of the rods were damaged or if debris in the pool would complicate the recovery effort.
The Wall Street journal noted:
Among the risks [Hiromitsu Ino, professor emeritus of nuclear engineering at the University of Tokyo] and other experts cite is the possibility that a container being used to move the units falls and breaks apart, exposing the fuel to the air.
Similarly, Edwin Lyman – a nuclear expert and the chief scientist for the Union of Concerned Scientists notes:
The biggest risk with Unit 4 pool unloading is that a spent fuel cask might drop and damage the pool, causing a leak that could expose some fuel and cause overheating.
Professor Richard Broinowski – former Australian Ambassador to Vietnam, Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Central American Republics and Cuba – and author of numerous books on nuclear policy and Fukushima, says some of the fuel rods are probably fused.
Murray E. Jennex, Ph.D., P.E. (Professional Engineer), Professor of MIS, San Diego State University, notes:
The rods in the spent fuel pool may have melted …. I consider it more likely that these rods were breached during the explosions associated with the event and their contents may be in contact with the ground water, probably due to all the seawater that was sprayed on the plant.
Fuel rod expert Arnie Gundersen – a nuclear engineer and former senior manager of a nuclear power company which manufactured nuclear fuel rods – recently explained the biggest problem with the fuel rods (at 15:45):
I think they’re belittling the complexity of the task. If you think of a nuclear fuel rack as a pack of cigarettes, if you pull a cigarette straight up it will come out — but these racks have been distorted. Now when they go to pull the cigarette straight out, it’s going to likely break and release radioactive caesium and other gases, xenon and krypton, into the air. I suspect come November, December, January we’re going to hear that the building’s been evacuated, they’ve broke a fuel rod, the fuel rod is off-gassing.
I suspect we’ll have more airborne releases as they try to pull the fuel out. If they pull too hard, they’ll snap the fuel. I think the racks have been distorted, the fuel has overheated — the pool boiled – and the net effect is that it’s likely some of the fuel will be stuck in there for a long, long time.
In another interview, Gundersen provides additional details (at 31:00):
The racks are distorted from the earthquake — oh, by the way, the roof has fallen in, which further distorted the racks.
The net effect is they’ve got the bundles of fuel, the cigarettes in these racks, and as they pull them out, they’re likely to snap a few. When you snap a nuclear fuel rod, that releases radioactivity again, so my guess is, it’s things like krypton-85, which is a gas, cesium will also be released, strontium will be released. They’ll probably have to evacuate the building for a couple of days. They’ll take that radioactive gas and they’ll send it up the stack, up into the air, because xenon can’t be scrubbed, it can’t be cleaned, so they’ll send that radioactive xenon up into the air and purge the building of all the radioactive gases and then go back in and try again.
It’s likely that that problem will exist on more than one bundle. So over the next year or two, it wouldn’t surprise me that either they don’t remove all the fuel because they don’t want to pull too hard, or if they do pull to hard, they’re likely to damage the fuel and cause a radiation leak inside the building. So that’s problem #2 in this process, getting the fuel out of Unit 4 is a top priority I have, but it’s not going to be easy. Tokyo Electric is portraying this as easy. In a normal nuclear reactor, all of this is done with computers. Everything gets pulled perfectly vertically. Well nothing is vertical anymore, the fuel racks are distorted, it’s all going to have to be done manually. The net effect is it’s a really difficult job. It wouldn’t surprise me if they snapped some of the fuel and they can’t remove it.
The Japan Times wrote:
The consequences could be far more severe than any nuclear accident the world has ever seen. If a fuel rod is dropped, breaks or becomes entangled while being removed, possible worst case scenarios include a big explosion, a meltdown in the pool, or a large fire. Any of these situations could lead to massive releases of deadly radionuclides into the atmosphere, putting much of Japan — including Tokyo and Yokohama — and even neighboring countries at serious risk.
Experts question whether it will be able to pull off the removal of all the assemblies successfully.
No one knows how bad it can get, but independent consultants Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt said recently in their World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013: “Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date.”
Nonetheless, Tepco inspires little confidence. Sharply criticized for failing to protect the Fukushima plant against natural disasters, its handling of the crisis since then has also been lambasted.
“There is a risk of an inadvertent criticality if the bundles are distorted and get too close to each other,” Gundersen said.
The rods are also vulnerable to fire should they be exposed to air, Gundersen said. [The pools have already boiled due to exposure to air.]
[Here is a visual tour of Fukushima’s fuel pools, along with graphics of how the rods will be removed.]
Tepco confirmed the Reactor No. 4 fuel pool contains debris during an investigation into the chamber earlier this month.
Removing the rods from the pool is a delicate task normally assisted by computers, according to Toshio Kimura, a former Tepco technician, who worked at Fukushima Daiichi for 11 years.
“Previously it was a computer-controlled process that memorized the exact locations of the rods down to the millimeter and now they don’t have that. It has to be done manually so there is a high risk that they will drop and break one of the fuel rods,” Kimura said.
Corrosion from the salt water will have also weakened the building and equipment, he said.
ABC Radio Australia quoted an expert on the situation (at 1:30):
Richard Tanter, expert on nuclear power issues and professor of international relations at the University of Melbourne:
Reactor Unit 4, the one which has a very large amount of stored fuel in its fuel storage pool, that is sinking. According to former prime Minister Kan Naoto, that has sunk some 31 inches in places and it’s not uneven.
And Chris Harris – a, former licensed Senior Reactor Operator and engineer – notes that it doesn’t help that a lot of the rods are in very fragile condition:
Although there are a lot of spent fuel assemblies in there which could achieve criticality — there are also 200 new fuel assemblies which have equivalent to a full tank of gas, let’s call it that. Those are the ones most likely to go critical first.
Some pictures that were released recently show that a lot of fuel is damaged, so when they go ahead and put the grapple on it, and they pull it up, it’s going to fall apart. The boreflex has been eaten away; it doesn’t take salt-water very good.
Nuclear engineers say that the fuel pool is “distorted”, material was blown up into air and came down inside, damaging the fuel, the roof fell in, distorting things inside.
Indeed, Fukushima documents discuss “fuel that is severely damaged” inside cooling pool, and show illustrations of “deformed or leaking fuels”.
The Urgent Need: Replace Tepco
Tepco is severely downplaying the risks involved in removing fuel rods. For example, Tepco’s head of the Fukushima plant, Akira Ono, says:
We have removed spent fuels many times. Therefore, we don’t think we are going to be doing anything that is very dangerous.
That is idiotic given that (as shown above) this is anything but a normal fuel removal operation.
Top scientists and government officials say that Tepco should be removed from all efforts to stabilize Fukushima. They say that an international team of the smartest engineers and scientists should instead handle this difficult mission.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is being told by his own party that Japan’s response is failing. Plant operator [Tepco] alone isn’t up to the task of managing the clean-up and decommissioning of the atomic station in Fukushima. That’s the view of Tadamori Oshima, head of a task force in charge of Fukushima’s recovery and former vice president of Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party.
[There’s] a growing recognition that the government needs to take charge at the Fukushima station…. “If we allow the situation to continue, it’ll never be resolved” [said Sumio Mabuchi, a government point man on crisis in 2011].
Because the U.S. controls Japanese nuclear policy, Americans should demand of our political representatives that they pressure Japan to kick Tepco off the job … and let an international team of scientists and engineers take over.
Postscript: As challenging as removing the fuel rods from the pool at unit 4 will be, it will be even harder at units 1 through 3. Specifically, it’s too radioactive for Tepco to even get a look at what’s going on in those 3 reactor pools, and they have no idea how to do it. Indeed, the technology does not even exist to approach those reactors, as the high radiation levels quickly destroy even robots.
Nuclear fuel rod expert Gundersen says the pool at unit 3 is in much worse shape than at 4:
Unit 3 is worse [than No. 4]. Mechanically its rubble, the pool is rubble. It’s got less fuel in it [than unit 4, but] structurally the pool has been dramatically weakened. And, god nobody has even gotten near it yet.
Tepco’s not up to it … we need a focused, well-funded international effort to fix this mess.
Why no transparent data are publicly available on ocean and fish contamination ? Only little information has become public:
Since a year it is clear:
Researchers are now saying that massive amounts of radiation have been puked in the ocean from Fukushima. 18,000 trillion Bq est.
Source Video= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0-m-h3U7I
This is a nasty situation, Gunderson was quoting the BEIR VII study (The Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation). You can look at the biographies of the authors here: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=379
I give a lot of credence to this guy:
Richard R. Monson, M.D., Sc.D. (chair), is associate dean for professional education and professor of epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health. He earned an M.D. from Harvard Medical School and an Sc.D. in epidemiology and biostatistics from the Harvard School of Public Health. He was a Fulbright scholar. His research interests in epidemiology include evaluation of the risks of exposure to radiation, health effects of exposure to machining fluids, and potential health effects of environmental exposure to chemicals. From 1992 through 2004, he was principal investigator of a Superfund program project award from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Dr. Monson has served on numerous national and international advisory groups, including two committees of the National Research Council (NRC), and on several public and private advisory committees that addressed issues concerning exposure to radiation and the potential health effects of environmental exposure to chemicals. He served as chair for the multinational peer review of the epidemiology program of the U.S.-Japan Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). Dr. Monson was a member of the scientific committee on Effects of Radiation on the Embryo-Fetus, of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). He served as editor of Cancer Causes and Control from 1993 to 1998. Dr. Monson has more than 150 publications in radiation and occupational epidemiology, including the text Occupational Epidemiology.
Read about latest sea contamination:
“JAPAN” KILLS AND ENDANGERS THE LIVES OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE AS WELL AS THE LIVES OF OTHER DENIZENS ON THIS PLANET.
A TOTAL INTERNATIONAL BAN AND BOYCOTT OF THE OFFICIAL “JAPAN” IS THE ONLY JUST RESPONSE TO HELP JAPANESE PEOPLE TO GET RID OF THAT GOVERNANCE AND OTHER MAFIA ORGANIZATIONS CHOKING THEIR LIVES AND STAINING THEIR DIGNITY.
The Japanese Government, while lying through their teeth to their citizens and the world at large also on Fukushima, has made sweeping changes to their constitution, reverting their country’s military back to the WWII statutes of the imperialists, but this time as vassals and under the command of today’s global aggressor: the USA – an extremely dangerous mix, which can not be trusted.
SURVIVAL & FREEDOM for PEOPLE & NATURE
Do you want to read or distribute a message in another language?
Just go to the free translation sites:
But don’t use these services for confidential texts – they are read and stored!
If you forward, please, still keep the reference to the source and
note in your distribution that the text is only an automated
translation, while the original can be obtained from ECOTERRA.
ECOTERRA Intl. nodes
Cairns – Calgary – Cassel – Cebu – Curitiba
– London – Nairobi – Roma – Paris – Wien
ECOTERRA – FIRST PEOPLES & NATURE FIRST!
24 h EMERGENCY RESPONSE PHONE LINE: +254-714-747-090
Marine Group: http://www.ecop.info
Green is Good – environmentalism is not political – it is sanity !s
ECOTERRA Intl. has no Petro-Dollars like other “conservation” orgs
Please help by becoming a donating subscriber today!
Please contact: ecotrust[AT]ecoterra[DOT]net
for making donations and to get your personalized donation rewards!
Please feel welcome to subscribe to any or all of our free mailing lists.
To subscribe to any group-list just go to http://ccmail.ecoterra-international.org/
(ECOTERRA Intl. keeps your Personally Identifiable Information
confidential and does not disclose, sell, trade or exchange e-mail
addresses or mailing lists.)
These are moderated lists [© 1972-2013] with low traffic on important issues:
(Defending natural rights of first and traditional peoples and
(also various lists for specific first nation peoples
e.g: http://www.ogiek.org , http://www.madhibaan.org or
(Protection of the old-growth or other natural forests and its peoples)
(Protection of all species of wild fauna and flora)
(Trackmaps for our common future)
(Protection of the atmosphere)
(Protection of the marine biosphere)
(Protection of terrestrial ecosystems)
(Protection of the aquatic ecosystems)
(Protection against genetically modified organisms)
(Protection of human health)
(Protection of free voyage, safe travel and caring visit)
(Protection of our values, our and our children’s heritage and future)
* The list of subscribers to the [NATURAL_DEFENCE] list will for
obvious reasons always be maintained off the cloud and off any server.
Though all our lists remain remain strictly confidential it can not be ruled
out that hacked servers or leaking clouds could be accessed by third party.
We go the extra mile and maintain the NATURAL_DEFENCE list off the grid.
(Secondment to the uprisings of the people around the globe)
CPU – COUNTER-PIRACY STATUS UPDATES (public)
SMCM – Somali Marine & Coastal Monitor ©
(All on Piracy, illegal fishing and dumping off the Horn of Africa
– internal only)
WILD_ROAR – (ECOTERRA ALERT BULLETIN)
FSM – FULL_SCOPE_MEDIA
(Free thinking, non-conforming investigative reporting and press
releases (hot news, investigative reporting, features & press releases
you hardly ever get from the mainstream media – English, German or
WTN – WILD_TIMES_NEWS
(- the hard-copy for people without internet access /
in English and in vernacular languages (postal address required)
To subscribe to any group-list just go to http://ccmail.ecoterra-international.org/
Our mailing lists are protected against snooping. Your email address is safe.
Therefore: If you have difficulties or to unsubscribe just send a (reply) mail to
LISTS <mailhub[at]ecoterra.net> which specifies the list name! Thanks!
CONTRIBUTION of INFO or ARTICLES
YOUR IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANY LIST AND
TO WTN ARE MOST WELCOME!
Please send your genuine contributions in any format to
However, proselytising or propaganda screeds will not be disseminated.
DO YOU NEED AN ECO-STRAIGHTLINER ?
Please contact highly qualified scientists (ecologists, marine biologists etc.),
lawyers, specialists and environmental experts or investigative journalists
with proven track record of not being lured or bullied by corporate or
governmental money via office[at]ecoterra.net
These are all no-nonsense people with vast experience.
Ask for the support of an ECO-Volunteer: Mail to office[at]eoterra.net
or become one yourself.
What you always wanted to know – check it out at:
EcoEarth.Info — Environment Portal” at http://www.ecoearth.info/ and
Eldis Gateway to Development Information http://www.eldis.org/
N.B.: For security reasons mails from ECOTERRA are very rarely
ever sent to these mailing lists with attachments.
If you happen to receive a message with an e-mail attachment,
please be aware that our sender address might have been spoofed
and we advise you to check that mail carefully without first opening
If you suddenly don’t receive mails from the usual list any more,
but didn’t unsubscribe, your mailbox or your ISP might have
been tempered with by (hidden) censorship – please let us know
Sorry, if your e-mail address bounces several times, your address
will be unsubscribed since we have to keep a rather strict
unsubscription policy. Please re-subscribe, if you suddenly don’t
receive your mails from the specific listserv.
Avoid having your e-mail with ISPs, who are on the list of
fraudulent and/or notorious mail interceptors and trackers like
aol, yahoo, msn, hotmail, gmail etc. We recommended Lavabit until it
was forced to close. The owner Levison said: “… I would _strongly
recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company
with physical ties to the United States of America.
Ad-mails (spam or UCE) are terrible, but don’t use ISP- or web-based
filters, since you never know their criteria. Stay in control and install the
anti-virus, anti-spam and firewall yourself, which are unfortunately
necessary in these days, and maintain them yourself on your system!
If you are forced to install pre-filtering then choose a service like
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/ who guarantees your mail safety,
supports the EFF and the work of progressive, non-profit NGOs.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: To ensure delivery of your mails, please add
“@ecoterra-international.org” and “@ecoterra.net” to your address book
and “whitelist” of your spam filter, and tell your ISP or company’s IT group
to allow this addresses to pass through any filtering software they may have
set up. If our emails don’t reach your inbox, also look in your “Bulk Mail”
or “Junk Mail” folder. If you write to us and you don’t receive a response
within two working days, please send your mail again – it most likely was
intercepted or got lost on the way. Try as much as possible to use
encrypted mail (PGP, GnuPG). Please request our pubic key.
! CAVEAT LECTOR !
NOTICE: This email and any files or attachments transmitted
with it may be confidential and/or privileged. The information is
intended solely for the use of the individual, entity, group or list
to whom it is addressed, except if earmarked for widest distribution.
Please see also our disclaimer and copyright rules at
Unless other sources are quoted or other indications given:
© means: Copyright © ECOTERRA Intl. 1972-2013 – all rights reserved
CL means CopyLeft: Copyright except for non-profit making
individuals / initiatives / organizations, if used to positively portray
what it wants to achieve, not misquoted and the source is credited.
If you are not sure what it originally was set out to promote you must
ask the author or creator first. This means that you can use it
(graphics, articles etc.), if you are not making money out of it, do
not have the intention of doing so and support the cause. If you don’t
you must get permission from the author to use it. Please send us a
copy of your publication.
Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for
non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and
elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not
necessarily endorsed by the ECOTERRA Intl. collective. All
contents is published under the Open Content License, if nothing
else is mentioned, but some rights are reserved under the Creative
AR means Anti-Copyright: Use freely for whatever you want it.
It comes from the perspective that copyright should not exist at all
or that there is no need to copyright the information or image as we
wish it to be distributed freely and reused in whatever way.
We have the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes the freedom to hold opinions without interference
and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through
any media and regardless of frontiers. Art. 19 UN-UDHR
This e-mail is protected by UN Resolution A/RES/45/120 and
A/RES/53/144 as well as EU – Annex doc 10111/06 conc. UN
Resolution 217 A (III) and the Paris Charta for a New Europe.
We do not tolerate censorship nor intercepts of our genuine e-mails.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled on 24 November
2011 already that generalized content filtering violates fundamental
rights. The court has thereby recognized the impact of Internet
filtering on freedom of expression and freedom of information.
This is a crucial step forward in the defence of Internet freedom.